↓ Skip to main content

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory Langerhans cell histiocytosis: outcome by intensity of conditioning

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Haematology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory Langerhans cell histiocytosis: outcome by intensity of conditioning
Published in
British Journal of Haematology, March 2015
DOI 10.1111/bjh.13347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul A Veys, Vasanta Nanduri, K Scott Baker, Wensheng He, Giuseppe Bandini, Andrea Biondi, Arnaud Dalissier, Jeffrey H Davis, Gretchen M Eames, R Maarten Egeler, Alexandra H Filipovich, Alain Fischer, Herbert Jürgens, Robert Krance, Edoardo Lanino, Wing H Leung, Susanne Matthes, Gérard Michel, Paul J Orchard, Anna Pieczonka, Olle Ringdén, Paul G Schlegel, Anne Sirvent, Kim Vettenranta, Mary Eapen

Abstract

Patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) refractory to conventional chemotherapy have a poor outcome. There are currently two promising treatment strategies for high-risk patients: the first involves the combination of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine and cytarabine; the other approach is allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Here we evaluated 87 patients with high-risk LCH who were transplanted between 1990 and 2013. Prior to the year 2000, most patients underwent HSCT following myeloablative conditioning (MAC): only 5 of 20 patients (25%) survived with a high rate (55%) of transplant-related mortality (TRM). After the year 2000 an increasing number of patients underwent HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC): 49/67 (73%) patients survived, however, the improved survival was not overtly achieved by the introduction of RIC regimens with similar 3-year probability of survival after MAC (77%) and RIC transplantation (71%). There was no significant difference in TRM by conditioning regimen intensity but relapse rates were higher after RIC compared to MAC regimens (28% vs. 8%, P = 0·02), although most patients relapsing after RIC transplantation could be salvaged with further chemotherapy. HSCT may be a curative approach in 3 out of 4 patients with high risk LCH refractory to chemotherapy: the optimal choice of HSCT conditioning remains uncertain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 20%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 10 25%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 60%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,980,285
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#5,536
of 7,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,470
of 268,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#47
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.