↓ Skip to main content

Effects of 12-week Tai Chi training on soleus H-reflex and muscle strength in older adults: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 4,345)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Effects of 12-week Tai Chi training on soleus H-reflex and muscle strength in older adults: a pilot study
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00421-011-2182-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yung-Sheng Chen, Zachary Crowley, Shi Zhou, Colleen Cartwright

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of 12-week Tai Chi (TC) training on the soleus (SOL) H-reflex modulation and plantarflexion muscle strength in older adults. Twenty volunteers were assigned into training (N = 14; 72.2 ± 3.7 years of age) and control (N = 6; 74.2 ± 6.1 years of age) groups. The participants in the TC group practiced Yang style TC 1 h per session, 3 sessions per week, for 12 weeks, guided by a qualified TC instructor. The ratio of the maximal peak-to-peak amplitude of SOL H-reflex (H (max)) to M-wave (M (max)) was determined during bipedal standing under four sensory conditions: stable surface and eyes open (SO), stable surface and eyes closed (SC), unstable surface and eyes open (UO), and unstable surface and eyes closed (UC). The maximal isometric plantarflexion muscle strength was also assessed by using a dynamometer. The results showed that the SOL H (max)/M (max) ratio increased significantly after the 12 weeks of TC training under the SC (37.0%), UO (33.3%) and UC (36.0%) conditions (P < 0.05). The maximal plantarflexion strength also improved significantly after training (19.8%; P < 0.05). In contrast, the control group showed no significant changes in all measurements after the 12 weeks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 2 3%
Denmark 1 2%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 20%
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Sports and Recreations 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 241. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2019.
All research outputs
#155,423
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#31
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#510
of 142,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.