| Title |
Analyses of multiplicity distributions and Bose-Einstein correlations at the LHC using negative binomial distribution and generalized Glauber-Lachs formula
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal A, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epja/i2018-12537-y |
| Authors |
Minoru Biyajima, Takuya Mizoguchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,838,180
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal A
#764
of 1,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,900
of 330,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal A
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,862 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.