↓ Skip to main content

Measuring coral size-frequency distribution using stereo video technology, a comparison with in situ measurements

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Measuring coral size-frequency distribution using stereo video technology, a comparison with in situ measurements
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10661-015-4431-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph A. Turner, Nicholas V. C. Polunin, Stuart N. Field, Shaun K. Wilson

Abstract

Coral colony size-frequency distribution data offer valuable information about the ecological status of coral reefs. Such data are usually collected by divers in situ, but stereo video is being increasingly used for monitoring benthic marine communities and may be used to collect size information for coral colonies. This study compared the size-frequency distributions of coral colonies obtained by divers measuring colonies 'in situ' with digital video imagery collected using stereo video and later processed using computer software. The size-frequency distributions of the two methods were similar for corymbose colonies, although distributions were different for massive, branching and all colonies combined. The differences are mainly driven by greater abundance of colonies >50 cm and fewer colonies <10 cm recorded when using the in situ method. The stereo video method detected 93 % of marked colonies >5 cm and was able to record measurements on 87 % of the colonies detected. However, stereo video only detected 57 % of marked colonies <5 cm, suggesting that this method may be unsuitable for assessing abundance of coral recruits. Estimates of colony size made with the stereo video were smaller than the in situ technique for all growth forms, particularly for massive morphologies. Despite differences in size distributions, community assessments, which incorporated genera, growth forms and size, were similar between the two techniques. Stereo video is suitable for monitoring coral community demographics and provided data similar to in situ measure for corymbose corals, but the ability to accurately measure massive and branching coral morphologies appeared to decline with increasing colony size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 38%
Environmental Science 11 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,802,361
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#1,115
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,577
of 267,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#14
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.