| Title |
Do fences constrain predator movements on an evolutionary scale? Home range, food intake and movement patterns of large predators reintroduced to Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-008-9452-y |
| Authors |
Matt W. Hayward, Gina J. Hayward, Dave J. Druce, Graham I. H. Kerley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 349 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 18% |
| Researcher | 63 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 11% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 209 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 84 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,002,375
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,794
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,061
of 89,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.