↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous Discovery, Estimation and Prediction Analysis of Complex Traits Using a Bayesian Mixture Model

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simultaneous Discovery, Estimation and Prediction Analysis of Complex Traits Using a Bayesian Mixture Model
Published in
PLoS Genetics, April 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004969
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerhard Moser, Sang Hong Lee, Ben J. Hayes, Michael E. Goddard, Naomi R. Wray, Peter M. Visscher

Abstract

Gene discovery, estimation of heritability captured by SNP arrays, inference on genetic architecture and prediction analyses of complex traits are usually performed using different statistical models and methods, leading to inefficiency and loss of power. Here we use a Bayesian mixture model that simultaneously allows variant discovery, estimation of genetic variance explained by all variants and prediction of unobserved phenotypes in new samples. We apply the method to simulated data of quantitative traits and Welcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) data on disease and show that it provides accurate estimates of SNP-based heritability, produces unbiased estimators of risk in new samples, and that it can estimate genetic architecture by partitioning variation across hundreds to thousands of SNPs. We estimated that, depending on the trait, 2,633 to 9,411 SNPs explain all of the SNP-based heritability in the WTCCC diseases. The majority of those SNPs (>96%) had small effects, confirming a substantial polygenic component to common diseases. The proportion of the SNP-based variance explained by large effects (each SNP explaining 1% of the variance) varied markedly between diseases, ranging from almost zero for bipolar disorder to 72% for type 1 diabetes. Prediction analyses demonstrate that for diseases with major loci, such as type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis, Bayesian methods outperform profile scoring or mixed model approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 364 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 90 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 23%
Student > Master 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Student > Postgraduate 17 4%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 61 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 165 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 15%
Computer Science 23 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 6%
Mathematics 7 2%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 69 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,338,364
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#1,010
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,862
of 279,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#18
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.