↓ Skip to main content

Paracetamol therapy and outcome of critically ill patients: a multicenter retrospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Paracetamol therapy and outcome of critically ill patients: a multicenter retrospective observational study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0865-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satoshi Suzuki, Glenn M Eastwood, Michael Bailey, David Gattas, Peter Kruger, Manoj Saxena, John D Santamaria, Rinaldo Bellomo

Abstract

To study the association between paracetamol administration in intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality in critically ill patients. We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study in four ICUs. We obtained information on paracetamol use, body temperature, demographic, clinical and outcome data from each hospital's clinical information system and admissions and discharges database. We performed statistical analysis to assess the association between paracetamol administration and hospital mortality. We studied 15,818 patients with 691,348 temperature measurements from 4 ICUs. Of these patients, 10,046 (64%) received at least one gram of paracetamol. Patients who received paracetamol had lower in-hospital mortality (10% vs. 20%, p <0.001) and survivors were more likely to have received paracetamol (66% vs. 46%; p < 0.001). However, paracetamol-treated patients were also more likely to be admitted to ICU after surgery (70% vs. 51%; p < 0.001) and/or after elective surgery (55% vs. 37%; p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis including a propensity score for paracetamol treatment, we found a significant and independent association between the use of paracetamol and reduced in-hospital mortality (Adjusted odds ratio 0.60 [95%CI 0.53-0.68], p < 0.001). Cox-proportional hazards analysis showed that patients who received paracetamol also had a significantly longer time to death (Adjusted hazard ratio 0.51 [95%CI 0.46-0.56], P <0.001). The association between paracetamol and decreased mortality and/or time to death was broadly consistent across surgical and medical patients. It remained present after adjusting for paracetamol administration as a time dependent variable. However, when such time-dependent analysis was performed, the association of paracetamol with outcome lost statistical significance in the presence of fever, suspected infection and in patients in the lower tertiles of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores. Paracetamol administration is common in ICU and appears independently associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and time to death after adjustment for multiple potential confounders and propensity score. This association, however, was modified by the presence of fever, suspected infection and lesser illness severity and may represent the effect of indication bias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Researcher 11 13%
Other 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 22 27%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,041
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,678
of 395,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#354
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.