↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of targeted falls prevention programme in subacute hospital setting: randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of targeted falls prevention programme in subacute hospital setting: randomised controlled trial
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2004
DOI 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.676
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terry P Haines, Kim L Bennell, Richard H Osborne, Keith D Hill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 163 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 21%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Researcher 18 11%
Other 12 7%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 23%
Sports and Recreations 11 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#54,052
of 64,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,897
of 66,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#202
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.