↓ Skip to main content

Living with oropharyngeal dysphagia: effects of bolus modification on health-related quality of life—a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
14 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
Title
Living with oropharyngeal dysphagia: effects of bolus modification on health-related quality of life—a systematic review
Published in
Quality of Life Research, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11136-015-0990-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katina Swan, Renée Speyer, Bas J. Heijnen, Bethany Wagg, Reinie Cordier

Abstract

Difficulty swallowing, oropharyngeal dysphagia, is widespread among many patient populations (such as stroke and cancer groups) and aged community-dwelling individuals. It is commonly managed with bolus modification: altering food (usually cutting, mashing or puréeing) or fluids (typically thickening) to make them easier or safer to swallow. Although this treatment is ubiquitous, anecdotal evidence suggests patients dislike this management, and this may affect compliance and well-being. This review aimed to examine the impact of bolus modification on health-related quality of life. A systematic review of the literature was conducted by speech pathologists with experience in oropharyngeal dysphagia. The literature search was completed with electronic databases, PubMed and Embase, and all available exclusion dates up to September 2012 were used. The search was limited to English-language publications which were full text and appeared in peer-reviewed journals. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Generally, bolus modification was typically associated with worse quality of life. Modifications to foods appeared to be more detrimental than modifications to fluids, but this may be due to the increased severity of dysfunction that is implied by the necessity for significant alterations to foods. The number of studies retrieved was quite small. The diverse nature of methodologies, terminologies and assessment procedures found in the studies makes the results difficult to generalise. Overall, even though the severity of dysphagia may have been a confounding factor, the impact of bolus modification on health-related quality of life in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia appears to be negative, with increased modification of food and fluids often correlating to a decreased quality of life. Further, associated disease factors, such as decreased life expectancy, may also have affected health-related quality of life. More research is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 280 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 18%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 61 22%
Unknown 79 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 68 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 18%
Psychology 17 6%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Linguistics 8 3%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 90 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,023,657
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#121
of 2,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,130
of 265,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#2
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,952 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.