↓ Skip to main content

New promising β-lactamase inhibitors for clinical use

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
New promising β-lactamase inhibitors for clinical use
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10096-015-2375-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Olsen

Abstract

Clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam have been used extensively for the last 30 years, together with β-lactam antibiotics, to inhibit the effect of β-lactamases. Although they have been useful as β-lactamase inhibitors in many cases, their effectiveness is restricted to class A β-lactamases. With the increasing frequency and breadth of β-lactamases now threatening public health throughout the world, we need a much broader spectrum of β-lactamase inhibitors efficient against all classes of β-lactamases. There are several β-lactamase inhibitors under development, but only a few of them are able to inhibit class D and even fewer class B metallo-β-lactamases (MβLs). The latter represent a real threat to the latest generations of β-lactam antibiotics, including cephalosporins and carbapenems. Only two β-lactamase inhibitors are, so far, under clinical evaluation, i.e., avibactam and MK-7655. The others are years from being clinically available. Although this has caused cautious optimism, the progress in this field is far too slow. This is particularly so because none of the substances provided are active against MβLs and because new β-lactamases invariably force their way into our therapeutic armamentarium. While waiting for new antibiotics and new β-lactamase inhibitors to become available, it is important to carry out accurate clinical and microbiological diagnosis, perform adequate hygiene, and use antibiotics properly. This may save lives and reduce resistance resulting from inappropriate antibiotic treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Other 10 10%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 9%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,711,849
of 24,396,012 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#668
of 2,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,543
of 268,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,396,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.