↓ Skip to main content

Videofluorographic Evaluation of Mastication and Swallowing of Japanese Udon Noodles and White Rice

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Videofluorographic Evaluation of Mastication and Swallowing of Japanese Udon Noodles and White Rice
Published in
Dysphagia, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00455-010-9295-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukihiro Iida, Akitoshi Katsumata, Masami Fujishita

Abstract

A videofluorographic (VF) swallowing study was performed on 22 healthy volunteers to observe the complete mastication and swallowing phases for Japanese udon noodles and white rice. The hardness, stickiness, and cohesiveness of food samples were measured using a food texture analyzing system. VF images were acquired using a versatile fluoroscopic unit and barium sulfate was used as a contrast medium. Udon noodles had a harder and smoother food texture than white rice. Fewer chewing movements and more stage 2 transport were seen during the consumption of udon noodles than for white rice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Turkey 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2011.
All research outputs
#14,075,458
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#939
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,407
of 97,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.