↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between bone density and bone metabolism in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Overview of attention for article published in Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Relationship between bone density and bone metabolism in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Published in
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13013-015-0033-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ko Ishida, Yoichi Aota, Naoto Mitsugi, Motonori Kono, Takayuki Higashi, Takuya Kawai, Katsutaka Yamada, Takanori Niimura, Kanichiro Kaneko, Hironori Tanabe, Yohei Ito, Tomoyuki Katsuhata, Tomoyuki Saito

Abstract

Several authors have confirmed that 27 to 38% of AIS patients had osteopenia. But few studies have assessed bone metabolism in AIS. This study assessed bone mineral density and bone metabolism in AIS patients using the bone metabolism markers, BAP and TRAP5b. The subjects were 49 consecutive adolescent AIS patients seen at our institutes between March 2012 and September 2013. Sixty-five percent of AIS patients had osteopenia or osteoporosis and 59% of AIS patients had high values for TRAP5b. The AIS patients with high values of TRAP5b had lower Z scores than those with normal values of TRAP5b. Higher rates of bone resorption are associated with low bone density in AIS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#91
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,940
of 278,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.