You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
OzDES multifibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey: first-year operation and results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/mnras/stv1507 |
| Authors |
Fang Yuan, C. Lidman, T. M. Davis, M. Childress, F. B. Abdalla, M. Banerji, E. Buckley-Geer, A. Carnero Rosell, D. Carollo, F. J. Castander, C. B. D'Andrea, H. T. Diehl, C. E Cunha, R. J. Foley, J. Frieman, K. Glazebrook, J. Gschwend, S. Hinton, S. Jouvel, R. Kessler, A. G. Kim, A. L. King, K. Kuehn, S. Kuhlmann, G. F. Lewis, H. Lin, P. Martini, R. G. McMahon, J. Mould, R. C. Nichol, R. P. Norris, C. R. O'Neill, F. Ostrovski, A. Papadopoulos, D. Parkinson, S. Reed, A. K. Romer, P. J. Rooney, E. Rozo, E. S. Rykoff, M. Sako, R. Scalzo, B. P. Schmidt, D. Scolnic, N. Seymour, R. Sharp, F. Sobreira, M. Sullivan, R. C. Thomas, D. Tucker, S. A. Uddin, R. H. Wechsler, W. Wester, H. Wilcox, B. Zhang, T. Abbott, S. Allam, A. H. Bauer, A. Benoit-Lévy, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, D. L. Burke, M. Carrasco Kind, R. Covarrubias, M. Crocce, L. N. da Costa, D. L. DePoy, S. Desai, P. Doel, T. F. Eifler, A. E. Evrard, A. Fausti Neto, B. Flaugher, P. Fosalba, E. Gaztanaga, D. Gerdes, D. Gruen, R. A. Gruendl, K. Honscheid, D. James, N. Kuropatkin, O. Lahav, T. S. Li, M. A. G. Maia, M. Makler, J. Marshall, C. J. Miller, R. Miquel, R. Ogando, A. A. Plazas, A. Roodman, E. Sanchez, V. Scarpine, M. Schubnell, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, R. C. Smith, M. Soares-Santos, E. Suchyta, M. E. C. Swanson, G. Tarle, J. Thaler, A. R. Walker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 40 | 82% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,069,925
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#23,403
of 32,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,262
of 264,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#217
of 632 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 632 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.