↓ Skip to main content

Indirect effects of algae on coral: algae‐mediated, microbe‐induced coral mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
399 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
819 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indirect effects of algae on coral: algae‐mediated, microbe‐induced coral mortality
Published in
Ecology Letters, June 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00937.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Smith, Morrigan Shaw, Rob A. Edwards, David Obura, Olga Pantos, Enric Sala, Stuart A. Sandin, Steven Smriga, Mark Hatay, Forest L. Rohwer

Abstract

Declines in coral cover are generally associated with increases in the abundance of fleshy algae. In many cases, it remains unclear whether algae are responsible, directly or indirectly, for coral death or whether they simply settle on dead coral surfaces. Here, we show that algae can indirectly cause coral mortality by enhancing microbial activity via the release of dissolved compounds. When coral and algae were placed in chambers together but separated by a 0.02 mum filter, corals suffered 100% mortality. With the addition of the broad-spectrum antibiotic ampicillin, mortality was completely prevented. Physiological measurements showed complementary patterns of increasing coral stress with proximity to algae. Our results suggest that as human impacts increase and algae become more abundant on reefs a positive feedback loop may be created whereby compounds released by algae enhance microbial activity on live coral surfaces causing mortality of corals and further algal growth.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 819 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
Brazil 10 1%
Mexico 6 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Other 12 1%
Unknown 761 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 170 21%
Student > Master 152 19%
Researcher 150 18%
Student > Bachelor 100 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 4%
Other 111 14%
Unknown 106 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 396 48%
Environmental Science 184 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 4%
Engineering 11 1%
Other 36 4%
Unknown 131 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2013.
All research outputs
#1,574,262
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#908
of 3,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,751
of 92,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.