↓ Skip to main content

The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
309 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
558 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12874-015-0022-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panteha Hayati Rezvan, Katherine J Lee, Julie A Simpson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 545 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 117 21%
Researcher 86 15%
Student > Master 69 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 9%
Student > Bachelor 34 6%
Other 95 17%
Unknown 107 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 24%
Psychology 57 10%
Computer Science 32 6%
Mathematics 31 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 5%
Other 122 22%
Unknown 156 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,605
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,418
of 282,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.