↓ Skip to main content

ERAP1 biology and assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ERAP1 biology and assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1501475112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip C. Robinson, Matthew A. Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Qatar 1 5%
Australia 1 5%
South Africa 1 5%
Unknown 17 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 20%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#19,337,766
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#95,933
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,909
of 263,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#879
of 987 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 987 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.