↓ Skip to main content

Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-3751-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Didier M. Payen, Joelle Guilhot, Yoann Launey, Anne Claire Lukaszewicz, Mahmoud Kaaki, Benoit Veber, Julien Pottecher, Olivier Joannes-Boyau, Laurent Martin-Lefevre, Matthieu Jabaudon, Olivier Mimoz, Rémi Coudroy, Martine Ferrandière, Eric Kipnis, Carlos Vela, Stéphanie Chevallier, Jihad Mallat, René Robert, The ABDOMIX Group

Abstract

To test whether the polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX HP) fiber column reduces mortality and organ failure in peritonitis-induced septic shock (SS) from abdominal infections. Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in 18 French intensive care units from October 2010 to March 2013, enrolling 243 patients with SS within 12 h after emergency surgery for peritonitis related to organ perforation. The PMX HP group received conventional therapy plus two sessions of PMX HP. Primary outcome was mortality on day 28; secondary outcomes were mortality on day 90 and a reduction in the severity of organ failures based on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Primary outcome: day 28 mortality in the PMX HP group (n = 119) was 27.7 versus 19.5 % in the conventional group (n = 113), p = 0.14 (OR 1.5872, 95 % CI 0.8583-2.935). Secondary endpoints: mortality rate at day 90 was 33.6 % in PMX-HP versus 24 % in conventional groups, p = 0.10 (OR 1.6128, 95 % CI 0.9067-2.8685); reduction in SOFA score from day 0 to day 7 was -5 (-11 to 6) in PMX-HP versus -5 (-11 to 9), p = 0.78. Comparable results were observed in the predefined subgroups (presence of comorbidity; adequacy of surgery, <2 sessions of hemoperfusion) and for SOFA reduction from day 0 to day 3. This multicenter randomized controlled study demonstrated a non-significant increase in mortality and no improvement in organ failure with PMX HP treatment compared to conventional treatment of peritonitis-induced SS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 17%
Other 32 15%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 49 23%
Unknown 50 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,545,031
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,336
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,240
of 282,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.