| Title |
Point-count methods to monitor butterfly populations when traditional methods fail: a case study with Miami blue butterfly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-015-9773-6 |
| Authors |
Erica H. Henry, Nick M. Haddad, John Wilson, Phillip Hughes, Beth Gardner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,667,840
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#136
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,739
of 264,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.