↓ Skip to main content

Circulation background of climate patterns in the past millennium: Uncertainty analysis and re-reconstruction of ENSO-like state

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Earth Sciences, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Circulation background of climate patterns in the past millennium: Uncertainty analysis and re-reconstruction of ENSO-like state
Published in
Science China Earth Sciences, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11430-015-5256-6
Authors

Ming Tan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 38%
Environmental Science 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,372,294
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Science China Earth Sciences
#273
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,302
of 305,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Earth Sciences
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.