↓ Skip to main content

Alternative futures for Borneo show the value of integrating economic and conservation targets across borders

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
78 X users
facebook
16 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alternative futures for Borneo show the value of integrating economic and conservation targets across borders
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7819
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca K. Runting, Erik Meijaard, Nicola K. Abram, Jessie A. Wells, David L.A. Gaveau, Marc Ancrenaz, Hugh P. Possingham, Serge A. Wich, Fitrian Ardiansyah, Melvin T. Gumal, Laurentius N. Ambu, Kerrie A. Wilson

Abstract

Balancing economic development with international commitments to protect biodiversity is a global challenge. Achieving this balance requires an understanding of the possible consequences of alternative future scenarios for a range of stakeholders. We employ an integrated economic and environmental planning approach to evaluate four alternative futures for the mega-diverse island of Borneo. We show what could be achieved if the three national jurisdictions of Borneo coordinate efforts to achieve their public policy targets and allow a partial reallocation of planned land uses. We reveal the potential for Borneo to simultaneously retain ∼50% of its land as forests, protect adequate habitat for the Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) and Bornean elephant (Elephas maximus borneensis), and achieve an opportunity cost saving of over US$43 billion. Such coordination would depend on enhanced information sharing and reforms to land-use planning, which could be supported by the increasingly international nature of economies and conservation efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 203 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 18%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 72 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 5%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 47 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#591,722
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#10,165
of 58,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,881
of 283,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#90
of 767 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 767 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.