↓ Skip to main content

The Na+/Cl−-Coupled, Broad-Specific, Amino Acid Transporter SLC6A14 (ATB0,+): Emerging Roles in Multiple Diseases and Therapeutic Potential for Treatment and Diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
The Na+/Cl−-Coupled, Broad-Specific, Amino Acid Transporter SLC6A14 (ATB0,+): Emerging Roles in Multiple Diseases and Therapeutic Potential for Treatment and Diagnosis
Published in
The AAPS Journal, December 2017
DOI 10.1208/s12248-017-0164-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohd Omar F. Sikder, Shengping Yang, Vadivel Ganapathy, Yangzom D. Bhutia

Abstract

Amino acids are essential building blocks of all mammalian cells, and amino acid transporters play a vital role in transporting them into cells and their further distribution among the various cellular compartments. There are ~ 430 known transporters in the solute-linked carrier (SLC) gene family, divided into 52 distinct families. Eleven of these gene families contain one or more amino acid transporters. These transporters differ significantly from each other in terms of substrate specificity, ion dependence, and energetics. Given the variety of roles they fulfill in human physiology, it is not surprising that a number of diseases are associated with the malfunction of these transporters. In particular, as amino acids are critical for cell growth, survival, and proliferation, the role of amino acid transporters in cancer is gaining increasing attention in recent years. The present review primarily focuses on one particular amino acid transporter, SLC6A14 (also known as ATB0,+), with regard to its relevance to specific diseases, including cancer, and the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease-related alterations in the expression of the transporter. Furthermore, the review highlights the possible utility of this transporter in drug delivery and also its therapeutic potential for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Chemistry 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,947,156
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#1,052
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,972
of 439,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.