↓ Skip to main content

Clinical relevance of 8q23, 15q13 and 18q21 SNP genotyping to evaluate colorectal cancer risk

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical relevance of 8q23, 15q13 and 18q21 SNP genotyping to evaluate colorectal cancer risk
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2015.72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont, Françoise Charbonnier, Estelle Houivet, Lorena Ippolito, Jacques Mauillon, Marion Bougeard, Caroline Abadie, David Malka, Jacqueline Duffour, Françoise Desseigne, Chrystelle Colas, Pascal Pujol, Sophie Lejeune, Catherine Dugast, Bruno Buecher, Laurence Faivre, Dominique Leroux, Paul Gesta, Isabelle Coupier, Rosine Guimbaud, Pascaline Berthet, Sylvie Manouvrier, Estelle Cauchin, Fabienne Prieur, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Marine Lebrun, Philippe Jonveaux, Jean Chiesa, Olivier Caron, Marie-Emmanuelle Morin-Meschin, Florence Polycarpe-Osaer, Sophie Giraud, Aziz Zaanan, Delphine Bonnet, Ludovic Mansuy, Valérie Bonadona, Salima El Chehadeh, François Duhoux, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Jean-Christophe Saurin, Marie- Agnès Collonge-Rame, Laurence Brugières, Qing Wang, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Jean-Marc Rey, Christine Toulas, Marie-Pierre Buisine, Myriam Bronner, Joanna Sokolowska, Agnès Hardouin, Anne-Françoise Cailleux, Hakim Sebaoui, Julien Blot, Julie Tinat, Jacques Benichou, Thierry Frebourg

Abstract

To determine if the at-risk single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alleles for colorectal cancer (CRC) could contribute to clinical situations suggestive of an increased genetic risk for CRC, we performed a prospective national case-control study based on highly selected patients (CRC in two first-degree relatives, one before 61 years of age; or CRC diagnosed before 51 years of age; or multiple primary CRCs, the first before 61 years of age; exclusion of Lynch syndrome and polyposes) and controls without personal or familial history of CRC. SNPs were genotyped using SNaPshot, and statistical analyses were performed using Pearson's χ(2) test, Cochran-Armitage test of trend and logistic regression. We included 1029 patients and 350 controls. We confirmed the association of CRC risk with four SNPs, with odds ratio (OR) higher than previously reported: rs16892766 on 8q23.3 (OR: 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-2.72; P=0.0007); rs4779584 on 15q13.3 (OR: 1.42, CI: 1.11-1.83; P=0.0061) and rs4939827 and rs58920878/Novel 1 on 18q21.1 (OR: 1.49, CI: 1.13-1.98; P=0.007 and OR: 1.49, CI: 1.14-1.95; P=0.0035). We found a significant (P<0.0001) cumulative effect of the at-risk alleles or genotypes with OR at 1.62 (CI: 1.10-2.37), 2.09 (CI: 1.43-3.07), 2.87 (CI: 1.76-4.70) and 3.88 (CI: 1.72-8.76) for 1, 2, 3 and at least 4 at-risk alleles, respectively, and OR at 1.71 (CI: 1.18-2.46), 2.29 (CI: 1.55-3.38) and 6.21 (CI: 2.67-14.42) for 1, 2 and 3 at-risk genotypes, respectively. Combination of SNPs may therefore explain a fraction of clinical situations suggestive of an increased risk for CRC.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 15 April 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.72.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Librarian 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,415,448
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#566
of 3,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,210
of 264,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#26
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.