| Title |
Conserved microsatellite markers of high cross-species utility for flying, ground and tree squirrels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics Resources, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12686-015-0439-1 |
| Authors |
Salisa Jumpa, Deborah A. Dawson, Gavin J. Horsburgh, Catherine Walton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,268,102
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#307
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,359
of 255,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.