↓ Skip to main content

Measurement of cortical porosity of the proximal femur improves identification of women with nonvertebral fragility fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Measurement of cortical porosity of the proximal femur improves identification of women with nonvertebral fragility fractures
Published in
Osteoporosis International, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00198-015-3118-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. A. Ahmed, R. Shigdel, R. M. Joakimsen, O. P. Eldevik, E. F. Eriksen, A. Ghasem-Zadeh, Y. Bala, R. Zebaze, E. Seeman, Å. Bjørnerem

Abstract

We tested whether cortical porosity of the proximal femur measured using StrAx1.0 software provides additional information to areal bone mineral density (aBMD) or Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) in differentiating women with and without fracture. Porosity was associated with fracture independent of aBMD and FRAX and identified additional women with fractures than by osteoporosis or FRAX thresholds. Neither aBMD nor the FRAX captures cortical porosity, a major determinant of bone strength. We therefore tested whether combining porosity with aBMD or FRAX improves identification of women with fractures. We quantified femoral neck (FN) aBMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, FRAX score, and femoral subtrochanteric cortical porosity using StrAx1.0 software in 211 postmenopausal women aged 54-94 years with nonvertebral fractures and 232 controls in Tromsø, Norway. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression analysis. Women with fractures had lower FN aBMD, higher FRAX score, and higher cortical porosity than controls (all p < 0.001). Each standard deviation higher porosity was associated with fracture independent of FN aBMD (OR 1.39; 95 % confidence interval 1.11-1.74) and FRAX score (OR 1.58; 1.27-1.97) in all women combined. Porosity was also associated with fracture independent of FRAX score in subgroups with normal FN aBMD (OR 1.88; 1.21-2.94), osteopenia (OR 1.40; 1.06-1.85), but not significantly in those with osteoporosis (OR 1.48; 0.68-3.23). Of the 211 fracture cases, only 18 women (9 %) were identified using FN aBMD T-score < -2.5, 45 women (21 %) using FRAX threshold >20 %, whereas porosity >80th percentile identified 61 women (29 %). Porosity identified 26 % additional women with fractures than identified by the osteoporosis threshold and 21 % additional women with fractures than by this FRAX threshold. Cortical porosity is a risk factor for fracture independent of aBMD and FRAX and improves identification of women with fracture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,807,732
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,215
of 3,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,747
of 237,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#51
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.