↓ Skip to main content

Suicide and Additional Homicides Associated with Intimate Partner Homicide: North Carolina 2004–2013

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Suicide and Additional Homicides Associated with Intimate Partner Homicide: North Carolina 2004–2013
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11524-018-0252-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sierra Smucker, Rose E. Kerber, Philip J. Cook

Abstract

Intimate partner homicide (IPH) is a critical public health and safety issue in the USA. In this study, we determine the prevalence and correlates of perpetrator suicide and additional homicides following intimate partner homicide (IPH) in a large, diverse state with high quality data. We extract IPHs from the North Carolina Violent Death Reporting System for 2004-2013 and identify suicides and other homicides that were part of the same incidents. We analyze the likelihood (in odds ration form) of perpetrator suicide and additional homicides using logistic regression analysis. Almost all IPH-suicide cases were by men with guns (86.6%). Almost one-half of IPHs committed by men with guns ended with suicide. Male-perpetrated IPH incidents averaged 1.58 deaths if a gun was used, and 1.14 deaths otherwise. It is well-known that gun access increases the chance that a violent domestic relationship will end in death. The current findings demonstrate that gun IPH is often coupled with additional killings. As suicidal batterers will not be deterred from IPH by threat of punishment, the results underline the importance of preemption by limiting batterers' access to guns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 20%
Psychology 16 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 29 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#518,781
of 24,770,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#83
of 1,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,015
of 332,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,770,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.