↓ Skip to main content

Self-Regulation of Breathing as a Primary Treatment for Anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 463)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
749 Mendeley
Title
Self-Regulation of Breathing as a Primary Treatment for Anxiety
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10484-015-9279-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravinder Jerath, Molly W. Crawford, Vernon A. Barnes, Kyler Harden

Abstract

Understanding the autonomic nervous system and homeostatic changes associated with emotions remains a major challenge for neuroscientists and a fundamental prerequisite to treat anxiety, stress, and emotional disorders. Based on recent publications, the inter-relationship between respiration and emotions and the influence of respiration on autonomic changes, and subsequent widespread membrane potential changes resulting from changes in homeostasis are discussed. We hypothesize that reversing homeostatic alterations with meditation and breathing techniques rather than targeting neurotransmitters with medication may be a superior method to address the whole body changes that occur in stress, anxiety, and depression. Detrimental effects of stress, negative emotions, and sympathetic dominance of the autonomic nervous system have been shown to be counteracted by different forms of meditation, relaxation, and breathing techniques. We propose that these breathing techniques could be used as first-line and supplemental treatments for stress, anxiety, depression, and some emotional disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 749 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 745 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 143 19%
Student > Master 123 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 6%
Researcher 41 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 5%
Other 106 14%
Unknown 249 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 144 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 90 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 9%
Neuroscience 37 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 4%
Other 116 15%
Unknown 262 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 250. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#151,371
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#4
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,557
of 280,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.