↓ Skip to main content

Peripheral Blood Cell Interactions of Cancer-Derived Exosomes Affect Immune Function

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Microenvironment, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Peripheral Blood Cell Interactions of Cancer-Derived Exosomes Affect Immune Function
Published in
Cancer Microenvironment, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12307-018-0209-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather R. Ferguson Bennit, Amber Gonda, James R. W. McMullen, Janviere Kabagwira, Nathan R. Wall

Abstract

Cancer-derived exosomes are constitutively produced and secreted into the blood and biofluids of their host patients providing a liquid biopsy for early detection and diagnosis. Given their ubiquitous nature, cancer exosomes influence biological mechanisms that are beneficial to the tumor cells where they are produced and the microenvironment in which these tumors exist. Accumulating evidence suggests that exosomes transport proteins, lipids, DNA, mRNA, miRNA and long non coding RNA (lncRNA) for the purpose of cell-cell and cell-extracellular communication. These exosomes consistently reflect the status as well as identity of their cell of origin and as such may conceivably be affecting the ability of a functional immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. Recognizing and mapping the pathways in which immune suppression is garnered through these tumor derived exosome (TEX) may lead to treatment strategies in which specific cell membrane proteins or receptors may be targeted, allowing for immune surveillance to once again help with the treatment of cancer. This Review focuses on how cancer exosomes interact with immune cells in the blood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,389,551
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Microenvironment
#59
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,073
of 329,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Microenvironment
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.