↓ Skip to main content

Quitting the smoke break: a successful partnership with the construction industry

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Public Health, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Quitting the smoke break: a successful partnership with the construction industry
Published in
Canadian Journal of Public Health, February 2018
DOI 10.17269/s41997-018-0019-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorette Dupuis, Heidi McKean, Hilda Chow

Abstract

The Conference Board of Canada cites that 77% of employees want to receive health information in the workplace. From 2014 to 2016, Ottawa Public Health (OPH) partnered with 25 construction companies, to implement smoking cessation programs on 41 construction sites. OPH partnered with local construction companies, unions, and workers to design, deliver, and evaluate a tailored initiative to build smoke-free culture and encourage quit attempts. Workers received group and one on one counseling and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) from OPH staff. Client satisfaction was assessed and used to inform ongoing quality improvement. Since 2014, this project has expanded from one pilot site to 41 sites and has engaged two of the largest construction companies in Canada. A participant's survey (N = 62) found that at 1 month, 40% remained smoke-free and 38% had reduced the amount tobacco smoked. At 6 months, 34% remained smoke-free and 45% had reduced their consumption of tobacco. Construction workers typically have high smoking rates and low engagement with cessation programs. Public health practitioners working with the construction industry must understand the culture, engage on-site champions, and articulate the added value of tobacco cessation to the business. Using this information on partnering with the construction industry, this innovative program, first of its kind in Canada, could be duplicated in other communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,228,045
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#92
of 1,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,660
of 330,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.