| Title |
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Head and Spinal Trauma: Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices Versus Low Molecular Weight Heparin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, August 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-004-7295-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mehmet Kurtoglu, Hakan Yanar, Yilmaz Bilsel, Recep Guloglu, Sevda Kizilirmak, Dincay Buyukkurt, Volkan Granit |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 21% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 47% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,919,343
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#565
of 4,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,687
of 63,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them