↓ Skip to main content

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator is an essential regulator of murine hematopoietic stem cell viability

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator is an essential regulator of murine hematopoietic stem cell viability
Published in
Blood, April 2015
DOI 10.1182/blood-2014-10-607267
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bryan L Krock, Tzipora S Eisinger-Mathason, Dionysios N Giannoukos, Jessica E Shay, Mercy Gohil, David S Lee, Michael S Nakazawa, Julie Sesen, Nicolas Skuli, M Celeste Simon

Abstract

Hypoxia Inducible Factors (HIFs) are master regulators of the transcriptional response to low oxygen and play essential roles in embryonic development, tissue homeostasis and disease. Recent studies have demonstrated that hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) within the bone marrow localize to a hypoxic niche and that HIF-1α promotes HSC adaptation to stress. As the related factor HIF-2α is also expressed in HSCs, the combined role of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in HSC maintenance is unclear. To this end, we have conditionally deleted the HIF-α dimerization partner, the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear Translocator (ARNT) in the hematopoietic system to ablate activity of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α and assessed the functional consequence of ARNT deficiency on fetal liver and adult hematopoiesis. We determined that ARNT is essential for adult and fetal HSC viability and homeostasis. Importantly, conditional knockout of both Hif-1α and Hif-2α phenocopied key aspects of these HSC phenotypes, demonstrating that the impact of Arnt deletion is primarily HIF dependent. ARNT-deficient long term HSCs underwent apoptosis, potentially due to reduced BCL-2 and VEGF-A expression. Our results suggest that HIF activity may regulate HSC homeostasis through these pro-survival factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#29,160
of 33,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,653
of 279,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#254
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.