↓ Skip to main content

Sustained High HIV Incidence in Young Women in Southern Africa: Social, Behavioral, and Structural Factors and Emerging Intervention Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Sustained High HIV Incidence in Young Women in Southern Africa: Social, Behavioral, and Structural Factors and Emerging Intervention Approaches
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11904-015-0261-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abigail Harrison, Christopher J. Colvin, Caroline Kuo, Alison Swartz, Mark Lurie

Abstract

Young women in southern Africa experience some of the highest incidence rates of HIV infection in the world. Across southern Africa, HIV prevalence among women increases rapidly between the teenage years and young adulthood. Adult HIV prevalence is 16.8 % in South Africa, 23 % in Botswana, 23 % in Lesotho, and 26.5 % in Swaziland. Existing research has illuminated some of the key social, behavioral, and structural factors associated with young women's disproportionate HIV risk, including gendered social norms that advantage male power in sexual relationships and age disparities in relationships between younger women and older male partners. Important structural factors include the region's history of labor migration and legacy of family disruption, and entrenched social and economic inequalities. New interventions are emerging to address these high levels of HIV risk in the key population of young women, including structural interventions, biomedical prevention such as PrEP, and combined HIV prevention approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 295 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 20%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 75 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 16%
Social Sciences 45 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 14%
Psychology 22 7%
Arts and Humanities 7 2%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 89 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,575,034
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#103
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,628
of 264,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.