↓ Skip to main content

Secondary Prevention of Heart Disease in Women: Gaps in Care/Gaps in Knowledge—Where Do We Need to Focus Our Attention

Overview of attention for article published in Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Secondary Prevention of Heart Disease in Women: Gaps in Care/Gaps in Knowledge—Where Do We Need to Focus Our Attention
Published in
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12170-015-0452-7
Authors

Emily Lau, JoAnne M. Foody

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Psychology 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#13,082,469
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports
#108
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,640
of 264,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.