↓ Skip to main content

Why Trees Are Important

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution: Education and Outreach, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Why Trees Are Important
Published in
Evolution: Education and Outreach, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12052-010-0279-0
Authors

Edward O. Wiley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 42%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,554,540
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#295
of 560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,131
of 98,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.