↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary innovation and ecology in marine tetrapods from the Triassic to the Anthropocene

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
74 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
Title
Evolutionary innovation and ecology in marine tetrapods from the Triassic to the Anthropocene
Published in
Science, April 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa3716
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil P Kelley, Nicholas D Pyenson

Abstract

Many top consumers in today's oceans are marine tetrapods, a collection of lineages independently derived from terrestrial ancestors. The fossil record illuminates their transitions from land to sea, yet these initial invasions account for a small proportion of their evolutionary history. We review the history of marine invasions that drove major changes in anatomy, physiology, and ecology over more than 250 million years. Many innovations evolved convergently in multiple clades, whereas others are unique to individual lineages. The evolutionary arcs of these ecologically important clades are framed against the backdrop of mass extinctions and regime shifts in ocean ecosystems. Past and present human disruptions to marine tetrapods, with cascading impacts on marine ecosystems, underscore the need to link macroecology with evolutionary change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Brazil 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 300 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 16%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Professor 19 6%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 60 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 39%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 62 19%
Environmental Science 29 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 66 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#278,519
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Science
#7,602
of 83,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,949
of 280,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#166
of 1,310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.