| Title |
Artificial Bone via Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Scenario and Challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13770-016-0001-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shivaji Kashte, Amit Kumar Jaiswal, Sachin Kadam |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 54 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,554,540
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
#19
of 158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,199
of 418,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them