You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Some extended psychological benefits of challenging social stereotypes: Decreased dehumanization and a reduced reliance on heuristic thinking
|
---|---|
Published in |
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1177/1368430214567762 |
Authors |
Francesca Prati, Milica Vasiljevic, Richard J. Crisp, Monica Rubini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 27% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Japan | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 146 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 28 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 68 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 7% |
Unknown | 33 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,777,427
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
#238
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,527
of 270,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.