You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-281-0 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-62703-280-3, 978-1-62703-281-0
|
| Authors |
Diponkar Banerjee, Sohrab P. Shah |
| Editors |
Banerjee, Diponkar, Shah, Sohrab P. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 31% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,992,245
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,773
of 13,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,741
of 281,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#73
of 340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.