↓ Skip to main content

Chemical Genomics and Proteomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: Protein identification by maldi-tof mass spectrometry.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Protein identification by maldi-tof mass spectrometry.
Chapter number 15
Book title
Chemical Genomics and Proteomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-349-3_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-348-6, 978-1-61779-349-3
Authors

Judith Webster, David Oxley, Webster, Judith, Oxley, David

Abstract

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometers are now commonplace and their relative ease of use means that most non-specialist labs can readily access the technology for the rapid and sensitive analysis of biomolecules. One of the main uses of MALDI-TOF-MS is in the identification of proteins, by peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF). Here we describe a simple protocol that can be performed in a standard biochemistry laboratory, whereby proteins separated by 1D or 2D gel electrophoresis can be identified at femtomole levels. The procedure involves excision of the spot or band from the gel, washing and destaining, reduction and alkylation, in-gel trypsin digestion, MALDI-TOF-MS of the tryptic peptides and database searching of the PMF data. Up to 96 protein samples can easily be manually processed at one time by this method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 17%
Student > Master 26 14%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 17%
Chemistry 19 10%
Engineering 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 51 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2011.
All research outputs
#14,137,641
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,141
of 13,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,375
of 244,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#244
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,011 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.