↓ Skip to main content

The unregulated commercialization of stem cell treatments: a global perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers of Medicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
The unregulated commercialization of stem cell treatments: a global perspective
Published in
Frontiers of Medicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11684-011-0150-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas Sipp

Abstract

Research into the biological properties and clinical potential of stem cells has spurred strong public investment, industry development, media coverage, and patient interest in recent years. To date, however, few clinical applications of demonstrated safety and efficacy have been developed with the exception of uses of hematopoietic stem cells in the treatment of diseases of the blood and immune systems. This lack of an evidence basis notwithstanding, hundreds of companies and private clinics around the world now sell putative stem cell treatments for an enormously broad range of medical and quality-of-life conditions. This represents a major challenge for legitimate scientists working in the field, for authorities seeking to protect their constituencies, and for patients and consumers targeted by such companies' marketing strategies. In this review, I provide an overview of the global industry in pseudomedical stem cell treatments, with an investigation of claims in a single disease area (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), and make recommendations for the introduction and enforcement of appropriate regulatory responses to this problem.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Social Sciences 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 19 29%