↓ Skip to main content

Disc herniations in astronauts: What causes them, and what does it tell us about herniation on earth?

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 5,209)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
102 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Disc herniations in astronauts: What causes them, and what does it tell us about herniation on earth?
Published in
European Spine Journal, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-3917-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel L. Belavy, Michael Adams, Helena Brisby, Barbara Cagnie, Lieven Danneels, Jeremy Fairbank, Alan R. Hargens, Stefan Judex, Richard A. Scheuring, Roope Sovelius, Jill Urban, Jaap H. van Dieën, Hans-Joachim Wilke

Abstract

Recent work showed an increased risk of cervical and lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) herniations in astronauts. The European Space Agency asked the authors to advise on the underlying pathophysiology of this increased risk, to identify predisposing factors and possible interventions and to suggest research priorities. The authors performed a narrative literature review of the possible mechanisms, and conducted a survey within the team to prioritize research and prevention approaches. Based on literature review the most likely cause for lumbar IVD herniations was concluded to be swelling of the IVD in the unloaded condition during spaceflight. For the cervical IVDs, the knowledge base is too limited to postulate a likely mechanism or recommend approaches for prevention. Basic research on the impact of (un)loading on the cervical IVD and translational research is needed. The highest priority prevention approach for the lumbar spine was post-flight care avoiding activities involving spinal flexion, followed by passive spinal loading in spaceflight and exercises to reduce IVD hyper-hydration post-flight.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Researcher 23 12%
Other 20 10%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 50 25%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 27%
Engineering 29 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 60 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#551,341
of 25,211,948 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#44
of 5,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,355
of 271,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#4
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,211,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.