↓ Skip to main content

Predicting prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a simple algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Predicting prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a simple algorithm
Published in
Journal of Neurology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00415-015-7731-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marwa Elamin, Peter Bede, Anna Montuschi, Niall Pender, Adriano Chio, Orla Hardiman

Abstract

The objective of the study was to develop and validate a practical prognostic index for patients with amyotrophic lateral scleroses (ALS) using information available at the first clinical consultation. We interrogated datasets generated from two population-based projects (based in the Republic of Ireland and Italy). The Irish patient cohort was divided into Training and Test sub-cohorts. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to identify significant predictors of prognoses in the Training set. Using a weighted grading system, a prognostic index was derived that separated three risk groups. The validity of index was tested in the Irish Test sub-cohort and externally confirmed in the Italian replication cohort. In the Training sub-cohort (n = 117), significant predictors of prognoses were site of disease onset (HR = 1.7, p = 0.012); ALSFRS-R slope prior to first evaluation (HR = 2.8, p < 0.0001), and executive dysfunction (HR = 2.11, p = 0.001). The risk group system generated using these results predicted median survival time in the Training set, the Test set (n = 87) and the Italian cohort (n = 122) with no overlap of the 95 % CI (p < 0.0001). In the validation cohorts, a high-risk classification was associated with a positive predictive value for poor prognosis of 73.3-85.7 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) for good prognosis of 93.3-100 %. Classification into the low-risk group was associated with an NPV for bad prognosis of 100 %. A simple algorithm using variables that can be gathered at first patient encounter, validated in an independent patient series, reliably predicts prognoses in ALS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 140 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 28%
Neuroscience 25 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 42 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#529,487
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#62
of 4,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,153
of 279,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.