↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular association of APP and tau fibrils induces intracellular aggregate formation of tau

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Extracellular association of APP and tau fibrils induces intracellular aggregate formation of tau
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00401-015-1415-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muneaki Takahashi, Haruka Miyata, Fuyuki Kametani, Takashi Nonaka, Haruhiko Akiyama, Shin-ichi Hisanaga, Masato Hasegawa

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by extracellular amyloid β (Aβ) deposition and intracellular tau aggregation. Many studies have indicated some association between these processes, but it remains unknown how the two pathologies are linked. In this study, we investigated whether expression of amyloid precursor protein (APP) influences extracellular seed-dependent intracellular tau accumulation in cultured cells. Treatment of tau-expressing SH-SY5Y cells with Aβ fibrils did not induce intracellular tau aggregation. On the other hand, in cells expressing both tau and APP, treatment with tau fibrils or Sarkosyl-insoluble tau from AD brains induced intracellular tau aggregation. The seed-dependent intracellular tau aggregation was not induced by expression of APP lacking the extracellular domain. The amount of phosphorylated tau aggregates in cultured cells was dose dependently elevated in response to increased levels of APP on the cell membrane. Our results indicate that the extracellular region of APP is involved in uptake of tau fibrils into cells, raising the possibility that APP, but not Aβ, influences cell-to-cell spreading of tau pathologies in AD by serving as a receptor of abnormal tau aggregates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Student > Master 24 20%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 11 9%
Other 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 25 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,063,912
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#776
of 2,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,532
of 264,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.