↓ Skip to main content

Review of Congenital Mitral Valve Stenosis: Analysis, Repair Techniques and Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Review of Congenital Mitral Valve Stenosis: Analysis, Repair Techniques and Outcomes
Published in
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13239-015-0223-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher W. Baird, Gerald R. Marx, Michele Borisuk, Sitram Emani, Pedro J. del Nido

Abstract

The spectrum of congenital mitral valve stenosis (MS) consists of a complex of defects that result in obstruction to left ventricular inflow. This spectrum includes patients with underdeveloped left heart structures (Fig. 1) to those with isolated congenital MS. The specific mitral valve defects can further be divided into categories based on the relationship to the mitral valve annulus including valvar, supravalvar and subvalvar components. Clinically, these patients present based on the degree of obstruction, associated mitral regurgitation, secondary pulmonary hypertension, associated lung disease and/or associated cardiac lesions. There are a number of factors that contribute to the successful outcomes in these patients including pre-operative imaging, aggressive surgical techniques and peri-operative management. Figure 1 (a) Image representing a parachute mitral valve with a small left ventricular cavity. Supra-mitral ring with a fibrous rim of tissue attaches to the mitral annulus and extends on the surfaces of the mitral leaflets. Stenosing mitral membranes or the thickened fribrotic rim of tissue grows on to the atrial aspects of the mitral leaflets restricting the effective orifice area. This thickened fibrous anterior leaflet tissue can extend down onto the chordae tendenae towards the papillary muscle creating an "arcade" like structure. Additional valvar components include commissural fusion and thickened fibrous leaflets that can lead to restricted leaflet motion. Note the sub-valvar or papillary muscle components of congenital MS including the shortened chordae tendenae, reduced inter-chordal space and tethering of the papillary muscles to the ventricle. (b) Pathologic specimen of a parachute mitral valve with a single papillary muscle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,807,732
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
#89
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,547
of 264,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them