| Title |
Associations of prostate cancer risk variants with disease aggressiveness: results of the NCI-SPORE Genetics Working Group analysis of 18,343 cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Genetics, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00439-015-1534-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian T. Helfand, Kimberly A. Roehl, Phillip R. Cooper, Barry B. McGuire, Liesel M. Fitzgerald, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Scott Bauer, Erin L. Van Blarigan, Xin Chen, David Duggan, Elaine A. Ostrander, Mary Gwo-Shu, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Shen-Chih Chang, Somee Jeong, Elizabeth T. H. Fontham, Gary Smith, James L. Mohler, Sonja I. Berndt, Shannon K. McDonnell, Rick Kittles, Benjamin A. Rybicki, Matthew Freedman, Philip W. Kantoff, Mark Pomerantz, Joan P. Breyer, Jeffrey R. Smith, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Dan Mercola, William B. Isaacs, Fredrick Wiklund, Olivier Cussenot, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Daniel J. Schaid, Lisa Cannon-Albright, Kathleen A. Cooney, Stephen J. Chanock, Janet L. Stanford, June M. Chan, John Witte, Jianfeng Xu, Jeannette T. Bensen, Jack A. Taylor, William J. Catalona |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,913
of 3,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,575
of 273,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.