↓ Skip to main content

New discoveries in CRMO: IL-1β, the neutrophil, and the microbiome implicated in disease pathogenesis in Pstpip2-deficient mice

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Immunopathology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
New discoveries in CRMO: IL-1β, the neutrophil, and the microbiome implicated in disease pathogenesis in Pstpip2-deficient mice
Published in
Seminars in Immunopathology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00281-015-0488-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Polly J. Ferguson, Ronald M. Laxer

Abstract

Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO), chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) and synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome are autoinflammatory disorder(s) in which sterile osteomyelitis is frequently accompanied by inflammatory conditions of the joints, skin, or intestine. Patients with CRMO commonly have a personal or family history of psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, and inflammatory arthritis, suggesting shared disease pathogenesis. Work by our group and others has demonstrated that dysregulation of interleukin-1 (IL-1) signaling can drive sterile osteomyelitis in the two human monogenic forms of the disease. Recent work in the chronic multifocal osteomyelitis (cmo) mouse model demonstrates that the disease is IL-1-mediated, that neutrophils are critical effector cells and that both caspase-1 and caspase-8 play redundant roles in mediating the cleavage of pro-IL-1β into its biologically active form. Recent data in the cmo mouse demonstrate that dietary manipulation alters the cmo microbiome and can prevent the development of osteomyelitis. Further investigation is needed to determine the specific components of the diet that result in protection from disease and if this finding can be translated into a treatment for human CRMO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,921,289
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Immunopathology
#308
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,243
of 264,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Immunopathology
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.