↓ Skip to main content

A Multi-Center, Qualitative Assessment of Pediatrician and Maternal Perspectives on Rotavirus Vaccines and the Detection of Porcine circovirus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
A Multi-Center, Qualitative Assessment of Pediatrician and Maternal Perspectives on Rotavirus Vaccines and the Detection of Porcine circovirus
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-11-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel C Payne, Sharon Humiston, Douglas Opel, Allison Kennedy, Mary Wikswo, Kimberly Downing, Eileen J Klein, Ana Kobayashi, David Locke, Christina Albertin, Claudia Chesley, Mary A Staat

Abstract

In 2010, researchers using novel laboratory techniques found that US-licensed rotavirus vaccines contain DNA or DNA fragments from Porcine circovirus (PCV), a virus common among pigs but not believed to cause illness in humans. We sought to understand pediatricians' and mothers' perspectives on this finding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Other 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 30%
Psychology 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#19,699,282
of 25,081,285 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,500
of 3,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,568
of 136,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#29
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.