You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic evaluation of suspected osteogenesis imperfecta (OI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1097/01.gim.0000223557.54670.aa |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter H Byers, Deborah Krakow, Mark E Nunes, Melanie Pepin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 19% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#2,860
of 2,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,146
of 88,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#18
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.