You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fire frequency matters more than fire size: Testing the pyrodiversity–biodiversity paradigm for at-risk small mammals in an Australian tropical savanna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.021 |
| Authors |
Anthony D. Griffiths, Stephen T. Garnett, Barry W. Brook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 51 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 48 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#847,973
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#738
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,982
of 281,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#9
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.