You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Activity-specific ecological niche models for planning reintroductions of California condors (Gymnogyps californianus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.002 |
| Authors |
Jesse D’Elia, Susan M. Haig, Matthew Johnson, Bruce G. Marcot, Richard Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 125 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,996,781
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,675
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,106
of 279,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#42
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.