↓ Skip to main content

健康食品による被害未然防止のための注意喚起情報の収集および解析

Overview of attention for article published in Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
健康食品による被害未然防止のための注意喚起情報の収集および解析
Published in
Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan, January 2018
DOI 10.3358/shokueishi.59.93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Etsuko Kobayashi, Yoko Sato, Keizo Umegaki, Tsuyoshi Chiba

Abstract

The prevalence of dietary supplement use has increased in Japan, and consumers can purchase supplements from foreign countries through the internet. Therefore, it is important to consider both domestic and overseas safety alerts to prevent adverse events associated with dietary supplement use. We have been collecting global safety alerts associated with dietary supplements and providing this information to the public via the "Information system on safety and effectiveness for health foods (HFNet)" website. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of safety alerts from 2010 to 2016 in HFNet (total: 2,124 alerts). The most common reason for alerts was illegal adulteration with pharmaceutical substances (85%), and sexual enhancement or weight loss products accounted for 68% of all alerts. Most alerts were based on market surveillance reports or recall information. However, 181 adverse event reports were identified, and most of them were related to weight loss or disease treatment in patients. In Japan, a majority of the adverse events was caused by products intended for weight loss or purchased online, and young female users were commonly involved. These findings should be helpful for prevention of adverse events associated with dietary supplement use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Student > Master 3 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2019.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
#294
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,559
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them